Saturday, September 11, 2004
Save Our Forests
David over at largehearted boy has a post up detailing what our environment is up against, particularly if Bush is re-elected.
This is from ourforests.org:
Go make your voice heard.
| Permalink Here
David over at largehearted boy has a post up detailing what our environment is up against, particularly if Bush is re-elected.
This is from ourforests.org:
On July 12, 2004 the Bush administration repealed the Roadless Area Conservation Rule, despite promising to uphold it. Now, 58.5 million acres of our national forests are at risk to destructive road-building, logging and drilling.
The Heritage Forests Campaign and our partners throughout the country are working feverishly to stop this shortsighted proposal, but we need your help! A public comment period started last week with this announcement and we need to let the administration know that the public wants our national forests protected not given away to corporate special interests.
We have set an ambitious goal of 1 million comments to send a clear and powerful message that we will not tolerate the administration giving our national forests away. Please send the letter below and if you have a few extra minutes please edit the letter with some personal comments.
Thank you for your continued support and please remember to comment today, to protect our national forests for tomorrow.
Go make your voice heard.
| Permalink Here
Friday, September 10, 2004
War
I agree with this:
| Permalink Here
I agree with this:
...Citizens of the United States are a decent, fair-minded people. The only reason we tolerate what is being done in our name in Iraq is that, for us, this war exists only in the realm of metaphor. The words "war on terrorism" fall on our ears much in the way that "war on poverty" or "war on drugs" did.
War is an abstraction in the American imagination. It lives there, cloaked in glory, as an emblem of patriotism. We show our love for our country by sending our troops abroad and then "supporting" them, no matter what. When images appear that contradict the high-flown rhetoric of war -- whether of young GIs disgracefully humiliating Iraqi prisoners or of a devastated holy city where vast fields of American-created rubble surround a shrine -- we simply do not take them in as real. Thinking of ourselves as only motivated by good intentions, we cannot fathom the possibility that we have demonized an innocent people, that what we are doing is murder on a vast scale...
| Permalink Here
Kerry's Gonna Lose
In Karl Rove's dreams! This post was lifted in it's entirety from a diary by cls 180 over at Kos.
Nine reasons why Kerry/Edwards will take it to the house:
Sounds like pretty good reasoning to me.
| Permalink Here
In Karl Rove's dreams! This post was lifted in it's entirety from a diary by cls 180 over at Kos.
Nine reasons why Kerry/Edwards will take it to the house:
1. George Bush had 3.4 million votes fewer than his challengers in 2000, this in a year when there was little interest in the election and the candidates were portrayed as the flip side of the same coin.
2. The only reason Nader is getting on state ballots is because Republicans are putting him there. Not Democrats, not Nader supporters, Republicans. Unless the Republicans who got him on the ballot actually go ahead and vote for him in November (and we have questioned the intelligence of Republicans on this site before), Nader will get far fewer votes than he got in 2000 (or at the very least he'll pull off the aforementioned unclear-on-the-concept Republicans).
3. Democrats are virtually united (at least for Democrats) in their desire to boot Bush. There is little likelihood that Democrats will jump ship in large numbers in November. Democrats have rarely shown such unanimity in any election.
4. Independents appear to be leaning Kerry in large numbers. You have to figure a Republican is going to proudly register as a Republican, no matter what. Independents appear to be disaffected Democrats more than anything else. Independents have overtaken Republicans in voter registration in a Harris poll I read recently (33% D, 29% R, 31% I)
5. Voter registration continues to defy expectations. After a slight increase in Republican registration after 9/11, Democrats are back to their historic advantage in registration numbers. I read on a diary this morning that registration in Durham, North Carolina alone favors Democrats by 6:1 or more.
6. Voter turnout for the primaries was phenomenal. Turnout in some states was 3 times normal. 5000 Republicans in New Hampshire alone wrote in a Democrats' name on their Republican primary ballots.
7. Three open House seats, 2 in very conservative districts, were taken by Democrats so far this year.
8. Polls run by the SCLM (So Called Liberal Media) consistently oversample Republicans and insist Kerry is in trouble. Fox, oddly enough, sees Kerry ahead or close to even. I'm just throwing out a possibility but you have to wonder, does Fox show the race close in order to scare Republicans to polls? Does ABC hope to spur Democrats with the same sort of reverse psychology? Just wondering.....
9. Bush has lost significant support among gays, Arab Americans, younger Cuban Americans, moderate Republicans, military families (if not military personnel themselves) and the elderly. Bush has gained support among......who? Name one large group of voters who can close the 3.4 million vote gap plus those Bush has lost since. Who are these people? Evangelicals alone won't cut it.
Sounds like pretty good reasoning to me.
| Permalink Here
First Amendment
This is what happens if you happen to get into a Bush rally and voice your opinion:
The accompanying caption from the AP:
Tip of the Horn to the prowling Red Wolf for sharing this.
| Permalink Here
This is what happens if you happen to get into a Bush rally and voice your opinion:
The accompanying caption from the AP:
A member of the audience pulls a demonstrator's hair as he forces her out of an auditorium where President Bush was addressing a crowd of supporters at Byers Choice in Colmar, Pa. Thursday Sept. 9, 2004.
Tip of the Horn to the prowling Red Wolf for sharing this.
| Permalink Here
Thursday, September 09, 2004
60 Minutes Blacked Out in Scranton
Those nasty glitches:
As long as they didn't show Janet Jackson's nipple ring all will be well.
| Permalink Here
Those nasty glitches:
A CBS affiliate in Scranton/Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania stopped broadcasting around the time ‘60 Minutes’ was supposed to be broadcast, leading thousands to question whether the network dropped the show because its content was critical of President Bush.
A news director confirmed that the program was not carried, saying, “Our transmitted busted.”
“I can tell you that it was not part of a vast right wing conspiracy,” he added.
One viewer, who asked not to be named, wrote to RAW STORY outraged that WYOU would pull the program.
“When the CBS affiliate goes off air at 8:00 PM, and promptly resumes coverage at 9:00 PM, and no other stations had technical problems – it’s a clear case of censorship,” the viewer wrote. Folks have been calling WYOU non-stop about this since last night, and station officials are extremely
defensive and hostile.”
“They refuse to re-broadcast the 60 Minutes episode,” the letter continued, “telling callers to “get a life” and “take it up with CBS” if they’ve got a problem.”
The reader also noted that because CBS and NBC are part of the same duopoly, both stations likely would have been affected, but NBC carried programming as usual...
As long as they didn't show Janet Jackson's nipple ring all will be well.
| Permalink Here
Jeopardy's Millionaire
You can find some news about Ken Jennings here.
If you don't want to know, don't click the link.
| Permalink Here
You can find some news about Ken Jennings here.
If you don't want to know, don't click the link.
| Permalink Here
Wednesday, September 08, 2004
You Don't Know Dick Cheney
Until you read this from Rolling Stone.
A choice graf about his service in Wyoming:
Fear More Years.
| Permalink Here
Until you read this from Rolling Stone.
A choice graf about his service in Wyoming:
...In an overwhelmingly Republican state, Cheney now had a safe seat in Congress for as long as he wanted. On Capitol Hill, he combined a moderate demeanor with a radical agenda. People who find Cheney's extremism as vice president surprising have not looked at his congressional voting record. In 1986, he was one of only twenty-one members of the House to oppose the Safe Drinking Water Act. He fought efforts to clean up hazardous waste and backed tax breaks for energy corporations. He repeatedly voted against funding for the Veterans Administration. He opposed extending the Civil Rights Act. He opposed the release of Nelson Mandelafrom jail in South Africa. He even voted for cop-killer bullets...
Fear More Years.
| Permalink Here
A Blog of No Words
Ever since Blogger added the "Next Blog" button at the top of my home page I've found some pretty interesting stuff. Some other people have found my little soapbox in the same way. Whileobsessing on perusing my traffic page I found a blog whose name intrigued me.
The Homeless Guy isn't about what you think.
| Permalink Here
Ever since Blogger added the "Next Blog" button at the top of my home page I've found some pretty interesting stuff. Some other people have found my little soapbox in the same way. While
The Homeless Guy isn't about what you think.
| Permalink Here
Cheney Says, "Wrong Vote Invites Attack"
Ramping up the politics of fear.
Everyone in the Bush Administration has said to expect another attack. The threat levels are going up-and-down like a yo-yo. And now our Vice President is insinuating that a vote for the incumbent will make us safer.
Without shame.
| Permalink Here
Ramping up the politics of fear.
Everyone in the Bush Administration has said to expect another attack. The threat levels are going up-and-down like a yo-yo. And now our Vice President is insinuating that a vote for the incumbent will make us safer.
Without shame.
| Permalink Here
Log Cabin Republicans Withhold Bush Endorsement
The gay and lesbian Republican group endorsed Bush in 2000 and Dole in 1996, not this time.
When you try to put an exclusionary amendment in the Constitution this is bound to happen.
Good for them.
| Permalink Here
The gay and lesbian Republican group endorsed Bush in 2000 and Dole in 1996, not this time.
When you try to put an exclusionary amendment in the Constitution this is bound to happen.
Good for them.
| Permalink Here
Tuesday, September 07, 2004
Huh?
Can someone please tell me what this means?
Is he advocating what is seems?
| Permalink Here
Can someone please tell me what this means?
President Bush offered an unexpected reason on Monday for cracking down on frivolous medical lawsuits: "Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country..."
Is he advocating what is seems?
| Permalink Here
Monday, September 06, 2004
Happy Labor Day
David Sirota and John Podesta have published an op-ed piece in the LA Times:
| Permalink Here
David Sirota and John Podesta have published an op-ed piece in the LA Times:
...Since his inauguration, the president has delivered more than 1,000 major addresses, news conferences and short public remarks. Yet he has uttered the phrase "middle class" in only 34 of them. On Thursday night at the convention, he kept the pattern going — the phrase never passed his lips.
Maybe it's just an oversight, but in such a highly scripted White House, is anything left to chance? Omitting references to America's most critical demographic is surely no accident — it's evidence of a tectonic shift in philosophy. No longer part of a bipartisan consensus that government should work to expand opportunity for ordinary Americans, conservatives are instead eliminating those opportunities. Bush's words — or lack thereof — simply punctuate the effort.
Consider, for example, decent wages. The gateway to the middle class is considered to be a salary of about $35,000 a year. Yet the Bush administration has refused to support a serious increase in the minimum wage, which at $5.15 an hour provides a salary of less than $12,000 a year — well below the poverty line. At the same time, the White House has worked to strip workers of federal overtime pay protections, and in budget after budget it has tried to cut billions out of job training programs...
| Permalink Here
http://www.top-blogs.com/cgi-bin/rankem.cgi?id=ebradlee